Editorial standards
What we publish, how it is made, and the checks it has to pass.
Who writes this site
Content on canadanext.blog carries the byline CanadaNext Editor. It names the site's automated editorial process, not a single reporter. Pieces are drafted by an AI model from material we can point to, then checked automatically against fixed rules before they appear. We say this openly because readers deserve to know how what they read is made.
Where the material comes from
- Daily Brief items summarize, in our own words, reporting published by established Canadian and international news organizations. Every item links to the reporting it is based on. We do not publish original reporting.
- Video summaries are written from the CanadaNext video itself: its title, description and transcript.
- Analysis draws on the week's most-watched CanadaNext video and current reporting on the same story, which is listed at the end of each piece.
Checks before publication
- Every Brief item must link to at least one source; links come from the source list, never from the model.
- Names that do not appear in the underlying material are treated as errors, and the item is dropped.
- We do not publish stories about crimes by individuals, court cases against individuals, accidents or victims, or anything described as a rumour.
- If a piece fails these checks, it is not published. The site keeps its previous version instead.
Perspective
Brief items are written to be neutral and factual. Analysis and videos carry the CanadaNext perspective, which puts Canada's sovereignty, economy and interests first, while sticking to facts that can be traced to the material.
Corrections
If you see an error, email canadanextbusiness@outlook.com with the page address. Confirmed errors are corrected on the page.